Don’t Underestimate the Value of ‘Wait & See’

“Adaptability is about the powerful difference between adapting to cope and adapting to win.”

–Max McKeown

Headed into May the S&P 500 closed down from its highs from the end of March. The ride has been particularly volatile, with the S&P at one point down 5.5% as of April 19. 

Spoiler alert: we did not reduce U.S. equity exposure heading into May. As intermediate- to long-term trend followers, we design strategies that generally keep us invested during times like this, which happen with more regularity than one might realize. 

In market situations like this, passive asset managers might make a comment about not getting anxious when routine declines happen.  “Don’t worry, these things happen, no need to panic we’ll just ride it out”, they may say with no plan on taking action at all. We differ from the passive crowd because we absolutely intend to act when there are material downtrends. We purposefully designed the timeframes utilized by our systematic investing process to ignore noise while standing ready to react when there’s meaningful evidence of a trend change.

In this month’s Note, we put the S&P 500’s performance in greater context, specifically relating to monthly declines of 5% or more. Additionally, we discuss how one of the biggest benefits of trend following is its ability to influence investor behavior by applying a disciplined, repeatable process that can help investors stay rational during unsettling times. In our view, this is the key to long-term compounding and will help you achieve your financial goals.

But first, here’s a summary of our take on what transpired in the markets heading into May.

Sourcing for this section: Barchart.com, S&P 500 Index ($SPX), 4/1/2024 to 4/29/2024

Disclaimer: This note is for general update purposes related to the general strategy and approach of Spartan Planning portfolios. Every client’s situation including Risk Profile, Time Horizon, Contributions, and Distributions is different from other clients. Your exposure to any given asset class will depend on your goals, risk profile, and how tactical or static your risk profile calls for. Adjustments can vary across strategies depending on each strategy’s objectives. What’s illustrated above most clearly reflects allocation adjustments for the Growth Strategy. If there have been changes to your risk profile and/or goals or if you wish to discuss them in more depth, please contact your advisor.

ASSET-LEVEL OVERVIEW

Equities & Real Estate

After a string of five consecutive positive months, the S&P 500 Index took a perhaps overdue breather in April, falling as much as 5.5% during the month. The decline was broad, with every major segment decreasing. The largest declines have thus far been small caps and technology. In fact, small caps have now turned negative for the year, signifying how material the drop has been.  

On the bright side, the trends that have driven positive returns for most U.S. equity assets remain intact. Therefore, based on the current price trends, Spartan portfolios will remain overweight U.S. equities. Moreover, allocations will generally increase due to our continuum-based approach to risk management, which involves stronger asset classes assuming the allocations of weaker yet similar assets. The handoff from real estate securities to U.S. equities is an example of that this month. 

Speaking of real estate securities, recent economic headlines have placed in severe doubt the prospect of lower interest rates in 2024. This has helped propel the asset class into downtrends across both timeframes. The result is a reduced allocation to their minimum level in our portfolios. 

International equities closed the gap in April but are still weaker than their U.S. counterparts. Due to the relative weakness, our portfolios will continue to be underweight. However, a small uptick in exposure will occur for emerging markets as it generally fell less in April and continued its uptrends.

Fixed Income

The same economic reports that have largely contributed to the recent down volatility in real estate have also affected fixed-income assets. In April, fixed income followed U.S. equities into the red, pushing further into negative territory for 2024 year-to-date. The intermediate-term uptrends that were clinging to a positive position entering the month have joined their long-term counterparts in a downward direction. Therefore, allocations will return to their minimum, with the exposure being moved to ultra-short-term Treasuries. Spartan portfolios will remain overweight on the very short end of duration and completely out of longer-duration instruments.  

Sourcing for this section: 

Barchart.com, S&P 500 Index ($SPX), 11/1/2023 to 4/29/2024; Barchart.com, Smallcap ETF Vanguard (VB), 1/1/2024 to 4/29/2024; and Barchart.com, Gold Trust Ishares (IAU), 1/1/2024 to 4/29/2024

 

Three potential catalysts for trend changes:

  • Not Slowing Down: Robust inflation data during the first quarter has raised questions about whether or not the Federal Reserve will be able to lower interest rates this year. “The recent data have clearly not given us greater confidence and instead indicate that it is likely to take longer than expected to achieve that confidence,” said Jerome Powell. At the press conference following the December 2023 meeting of the Federal Open Markets Committee, Powell’s tone was markedly dovish. He took the markets by surprise when he acknowledged the Committee had discussed conditions for rate cuts and would not have to wait until inflation was at 2%. Economists are forecasting core inflation will end 2024 above 3%, which is up from 2.8% in March and moving even further above the Fed’s 2% target.

  • Going Backwards: Mortgage rates have rebounded past 7% and home sales in March slowed. In fact, they had their biggest monthly drop in more than a year, which renewed pressure on the U.S. housing market as confusion over real-estate commissions shakes the industry. According to a recent report from Freddie Mac, the average rate for the standard 30-year fixed mortgage has jumped by almost a quarter percentage point to 7.1%, yielding the highest mortgage rate level since late 2023 and the largest weekly increase in almost a year. The recent jump in borrowing costs could drag affordability back to the new lows it reached last year. Home prices are near record highs and other costs to own a home, such as insurance premiums, property taxes, and maintenance, have increased as well.

  • Job Switching: The Federal Trade Commission has banned employers from using non-compete contracts for most workers.  These were typically used by companies to prevent workers from joining rival firms. The new ban is already facing legal challenges from business groups, and the court decisions could have widespread implications, as the practice has grown more prevalent in the U.S. economy and now affects one in five American workers.

Sourcing for this section:

The Wall Street Journal, “Powell Dials Back Expectations on Rate Cuts,” 4/16/2024; Bloomberg, “What 60,000 Headlines Say About the Fed’s Next Move,” 4/28/2024; The Wall Street Journal, “Housing Market Slumps as Mortgage Rates Top 7%,” 4/18/2024; and The Wall Street Journal, “FTC Bans Noncompete Agreements That Restrict Job Switching,” 4/23/2024

Even in Years with Above-Average Performance, Equity Markets Usually Have Points of Decline

“That’s the beauty of discipline. It trumps everything.”

–David Goggins

Even in the best of years, equity markets experience negative monthly returns. In fact, if you go back to 2000, there is only one year when the S&P 500 Index rose in all 12 months: 2017. This means that even in years of above-average performance — such as 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2013, 2009, and so on — equity markets usually fall. In fact, it is common to see 5% monthly declines or more. 

Since the inception of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust in 1993, it has experienced a monthly decline of 5% or more 36 times. That averages out to more than one per year. A quick glance at the list of those years with above-average performance years shows they are not exempt from this occurrence either. 

Over the years, one of the central tenets of our Monthly Notes has been to comment on studies that document average investor performance versus the S&P 500 Index. These studies show that investors tend to underperform versus a simple strategy of buying and holding a passive index — and by wide margins. There are many possible explanations. In our opinion, a big one is the average investor’s inability to decipher between times to hold and times to run. 

To counteract this tendency, we turn to trend-following principles, which we think offer a more rational, systematic approach.

We believe one of the biggest benefits of trend following is its ability to influence investor behavior by applying a disciplined, repeatable process. Let’s explore what we mean. 

Good behavior is generally understood as making the right decision among various choices, but as Charlie Munger would say, “Invert, always invert!” Inverting this thought would be saying that good behavior is making right decisions, but also avoiding the wrong ones. We think a major benefit of being good at avoiding potentially stupid decisions is that it is arguably easier to achieve and more repeatable than the reverse, trying to be smarter than everyone else. 

From our research, selling when a market is in a long-term uptrend but declines a few percentage points is usually a bad decision. Thus, in today’s market, following our rules and staying overweight in equities creates what we believe is good behavior that can benefit our clients. Doing so over and over means we can target performing well over many years, seeking to do so without having to play catch-up or endure the stress of falling way behind. 

A sibling (or maybe close cousin…) to behavior is discipline. If behavior is making right decisions and avoiding dumb ones, discipline is the ability to do that repeatedly in the face of stress, doubt, and outside pressure. We agree with the sentiment captured in the quote above from former Navy Seal and ultramarathoner David Goggins: discipline trumps everything. We think that if you’re following even a subpar investing process, discipline is what fosters compounding, which simply needs time to produce potentially great results. No brilliance is necessary!

In our experience, investors often overthink the need to time entries and exits perfectly (the old adage, buy low, sell high). They constantly fear a bear market and look for reasons to trim exposure or exit when they should be adding to positions. Likewise (though less often), they may look for reasons to buy when they should actually be reducing exposure or heading to safety. If there is anything we are confident of, it is having a theme of participating in most of the positive markets and avoiding most of the negative markets is far better than guessing at (but rarely achieving) the specific timing of really great entries and exits in those markets.  This is at the heart of a saying many of you have heard from us about being “consistently good instead of occasionally great.” That is at the heart of our stewardship for your financial lives and we believe, helps you have confidence in achieving your goals.

Sincerely,

The Spartan Team

Disclaimer: this note is for general update purposes related to the strategy and approach of Spartan Planning portfolios. Every client’s situation including Risk Profile, Time Horizon, Contributions, and Distributions is different from other clients. Your particular exposure to any given asset class will depend on your goals, risk profile, and how tactical or passive your risk profile calls for. If there have been changes to your risk profile and/or goals or if you wish to discuss them in more depth please contact your advisor. This email and the data herein is not a solicitation to invest in any investment product nor is it intended to provide investment advice. It is intended for information purposes only and should be used by investment professionals and investors who are knowledgeable of the risks involved. No representation is made that any investment will or is likely to achieve results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. While every effort has been made to provide data from sources considered to be reliable, no guarantee of accuracy is given. Historical data are presented for informational purposes only. Investment programs described herein contain significant risks. A secondary market may not exist or develop for some investments portrayed. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Investment decisions should be made based on the investors specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, tax liability, risk tolerance and other relevant factors. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein. Investors should consider the underlying funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The Advisor’s ADV, which contains this and other important information, should be read carefully before investing. ETFs trade like stocks and may trade for less than their net asset value. Spartan Planning Group, LLC (“Spartan” or the “Advisor”) is registered as an investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Registration does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the SEC nor does it indicate that the Adviser has attained a particular level of skill or ability. Indexes are unmanaged and do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses. Spartan’s risk-management process includes an effort to monitor and manage risk, but should not be confused with and does not imply low risk or the ability to control risk. There are risks associated with any investment approach, and Spartan strategies have their own set of risks to be aware of. First, there are the risks associated with the long-term strategic holdings for each of the strategies. The more aggressive the Spartan strategy selected, the more likely the strategy will contain larger weights in riskier asset classes, such as equities. Second, there are distinct risks associated with Spartan Strategies’ shorter-term tactical allocations, which can result in more concentration towards a certain asset class or classes. This introduces the risk that Spartan could be on the wrong side of a tactical overweight, thus resulting in a drag on overall performance or loss of principal. International investments may involve additional risks, which could include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, political instability, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks. Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets